Lesson 12: “Chrononutrition”, the Timing of When We Eat

Table of Contents


In the first 11 lessons I discussed quantitative and qualitative aspects of nutrition. In this lesson I will discuss considerations of “chrononutrition”, the timing of when you eat.

There are several different aspects regarding the timing of nutrition. With respect to dieting to lose weight, one consideration is to eat at a constant caloric deficit every day (“CER”: continuous energy restriction) vs breaking up dieting in daily, weekly, or longer periods (“IER”: intermittent energy restriction). With respect to nutrition in any one day, considerations include how many meals to consume each day, the timing of the meals, the size of the meals, and the total window of time within which to consume all of your calories (ie, a 4-hour vs. 8-hour vs. all-day eating period). There is some overlap between these topics.

Note: Terminology in the research literature is not completely congruent with terminology used by the general public. For example, a popular eating strategy in the general public is intermittent fasting (“IF”), which is frequently done by consuming all of your calories in an 8-hour window any given day. In the research literature this strategy is referred to as time-restricted eating (“TRE”, also frequently referred to as time-restricted feeding (“TRF”), with some making a distinction that feeding occurs in animal studies and eating occurs in human studies), while IF is typically used similarly to intermittent energy restriction (“IER”) and can describe a diet such as the 5:2 diet where there are 2 days of intense energy restriction in any given week. I will mainly be using terms here that match the research literature. When there may be ambiguity, I will attempt to make this clear.

Intermittent energy restriction (“IER”) and intermittent fasting (“IF”)

Note: In this section I am using IER and IF to refer to several different types of dieting protocols, including:

  • significant caloric restriction on some days of the week interspersed with days with less or no caloric restriction
  • complete fasting ≥1 day of the week interspersed with days with less or no caloric restriction
  • caloric restriction every day for ≥1 week interspersed with ≥1 week with less or no caloric restriction

I am not referring to TRE studies, where caloric consumption is restricted to a specific time period any given day; TRE is discussed further below. If this seems confusing, please read the above note.

When fasting for extended periods of time metabolism shifts in the body to primarily utilize ketone bodies, which can begin to rise after fasting 8-12 hours and continue rising further as fasting extends to 2-5 days while glycogen stores are depleted and other associated physiologic changes occur.(Stratton, 2022) This upregulation of various metabolic and genetic pathways while fasting has been associated with many potential health benefits regarding glucose homeostasis, blood pressure, resting heart rate, antioxidant utilization, autophagy, neuronal stress resistance, downregulation of inflammation, and may even impair energy metabolism in cancer cells.(de Cabo, 2020) Most of the literature supporting these benefits comes from animal studies and small human trials. While promising, it remains to be seen how much these benefits of fasting fully carry over to humans.

On that note, thus far many of the studies on CER, IF, the 5:2 diet, and even modified alternate day fasting (where every other day you consume up to 25% of your total daily energy expenditure in calories, and you alternate this with days where you eat as much as you want) likely do not incorporate long enough total fasting periods to observe any potential benefit of a prolonged fast, and the complete alternate day fasting trials (alternating days of no caloric intake) have generally been done with either no comparative group or a comparative group with confounding characteristics.(Templeman, 2020) Some of the TRE studies likely do contain long enough fasting windows as many of these incorporate fasting periods of ≥16 hours.

Additionally, as a general rule of thumb fasting protocols induce weight loss, and thus it is important to consider if the benefits are due to fasting or due to weight loss itself.

Overview of the research

General reviews:

  • A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis (“SR/MA”) examining IER & TRE trials and their impact on BMI & glucose metabolism found that compared to CER there was a small but significant benefit for body mass index (“BMI”) (-0.75 kg/m2), fasting glucose level (-4.1 mg/dL), insulin resistance, adiponectin, and leptin.(Cho, 2019)
  • A 2020 SR/MA of randomized controlled trials (“RCTs”) of individuals with overweight or obesity who were put on various fasting protocols found small improvements in body weight and a variety of cardiometabolic markers; the control groups were on non-fasting protocols but were not necessarily matched for energy restriction.(Yan, 2020)
  • A 2020 SR/MA including both IER and TRE trials found no significant impact on weight, but in 5 studies exclusively enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (“T2DM”) favorable effects were seen on measures of blood glucose control.(Welton, 2020)
  • A 2022 MA of various types of IER and IF protocols found no consistent benefits relative to CER.(Gu, 2022)
  • A 2022 MA of 16 randomized controlled trials found no clinically significant differences in various cardiometabolic metrics, weight loss, or change in body fat percentage when comparing various IER protocols to continuous energy restriction.(Kim, 2022)
  • A 2023 MA evaluating various IF protocols found perhaps a slight benefit to alternate day fasting but not to the point of being clinically significant.(Elortegui Pascual, 2023)
  • A 2024 network MA comparing different IF protocols with CER also found mild benefits to alternate day fasting and the 5:2 diet, but the clinical significance of this long-term is questionable.(Ma, 2024)

Note: Regarding IF or IER protocols in patients with T2DM care must be taken to prevent hypoglycemic episodes.(He, 2021) Please discuss with your physician regarding any medication adjustments or other considerations if this applies to you.

Regarding direct comparisons of IER and CER:

  • A review article discussing IF in humans and going over the various health benefits seen found that the vast majority of health effects are comparable to CER.(Mattson, 2017)
  • Several SR/MAs that only considered IER vs CER found no benefit for weight loss, glucose, cholesterol/lipids, or blood pressure levels.(Headland, 2016; Cioffi, 2018; Roman, 2019; Enríquez Guerrero, 2020; Meng, 2020; Schwingshackl 2021)
  • A 2021 Cochrane review found no benefit of IER vs CER regarding body weight or glucose outcomes; results varied widely indicating there may be differences found as more studies are conducted.(Allaf, 2021) There were no overly significantly side effects reported from IER, with only 4 trials reporting side effects, which mostly consisted of mild headaches.
  • A 2021 SR/MA comparing IER and CER RCTs that matched caloric intake found only small, likely clinically insignificant, differences in outcomes in favor of IER.(He, 2021)
  • A 2022 MA of various types of IER and IF protocols found no consistent benefits relative to CER.(Gu, 2022)
  • A 2022 MA comparing IER to CER found at most very minor benefits to IER for body weight but not for BMI, waist circumference, cholesterol, or triglyceride levels.(Zhang, 2022)
  • A 2023 SR/MA comparing IER to CER found no clinically meaningful differences between the two for anthropometric outcomes or cardiometabolic risk factors.(Schroor, 2023)
  • A 2024 SR/network MA comparing different IER regimens found ADF may be silghtly favorable compared to others, yielding additional fat loss of <2 kg and waist circumference loss <2 cm.(Zhao, 2024)

A SR/MA considering IER of fairly long duration (energy restriction periods ranging from 2-12+ weeks at different levels of caloric deficits) found no significant benefit for weight loss compared to CER.(Harris, 2018) In contrast to this, the MATADOR study compared 2-week energy restriction blocks (at 67% maintenance calories) interspersed with 2-week energy maintenance blocks (8 dieting blocks total) to 16 weeks of CER (also at 67% maintenance calories) and found better results in the intermittent dieting group.(Byrne, 2018)

Note: In the MATADOR study the intermittent dieting group had 8 x 2-week blocks of energy restriction and 7 x 2-week blocks of energy maintenance (yielding 30 total weeks) compared to 16 weeks total for the CER group. All main meals were provided. The intermittent group that completed the protocol lost 14.1 kg compared to 9.1 kg for the CER group. It is unclear how much additional weight the CER group would have lost had they continued to 30 weeks.

The more interesting aspect of this study is that both groups had 16 weeks at 67% maintenance calories but the intermittent group lost significantly more weight (and also maintained significantly greater weight loss at 6 months follow-up). This may be due in part to amelioration of adaptive thermogenesis (discussed in Lesson 1) from eating at maintenance in the 2-week blocks or due to better dietary adherence (it is likely easier to adhere to a diet in 2-week blocks than for 16 weeks consecutively).

Following the MATADOR study, a trial comparing intermittent dieting in 1-week blocks to a 5:2 diet and also CER for a 1-year period was published; there were no differences in results.(Headland, 2020) Maximum weight loss was at 6-9 months in all groups with regain occurring after that. After an additional year follow-up beyond the end of the trial there were still no differences between the groups.(Headland, 2020) A separate study has evaluated dieting for 6 weeks at a prescribed 25% calorie deficit vs doing the same thing but with a 1-week “diet break” where participants ate at maintenance after the 2nd week and 4th week of eating a caloric deficit; there were generally no differences in outcomes between the two groups.(Siedler, 2023) A 2024 SR found no benefits to planned pauses of ≥ 1 week in duration vs. CER.(Wren, 2024)

Considerations of lean body mass retention:

Additionally, as alluded to in prior lessons, fasting for prolonged periods will likely lead to a loss of lean body mass, which is generally undesirable. However, a recent SR/MA evaluating 8 studies (all ≤12 weeks duration with relatively small sample sizes and different fasting protocols) did not find any loss of lean body mass in the intermittent fasting groups compared to control groups.(Ashtary-Larky, 2021) Of note, the intermittent fasting groups maintained their protein intake in these studies relative to the control groups. A separate SR of 8 studies (1 with modified alternate day fasting, 3 with Ramadan IF, 4 with TRE) also found generally no loss of lean body mass with the various interventions, while several did show a loss of body fat.(Keenan, 2020) In a separate analysis, studies including Ramadan IF and TRE were not found to have an overly significant impact on various exercise performance measures, though sample sizes were small, and one difference was found; aerobic capacity decreased with Ramadan IF studies while it increased with TRE studies.(Correia, 2020)

Despite these positive findings, as recently reviewed, many of the studies that show no loss of lean body mass include short trial lengths and do not use the most accurate available assessments of skeletal muscle mass and hypertrophy.(Williamson, 2021) As it can take several months to notice significant levels of hypertrophy, perhaps if studies were done over longer time periods a negative impact on skeletal muscle mass would be noticed.

Should you utilize an IER approach?

Overall, there is very little evidence indicating superior outcomes of IF or IER protocols compared to continuous dieting schemes, and in fact the majority of the evidence suggests similar outcomes. A 2021 narrative review described the lack of additional benefit of various IER protocols relative to CER and the authors additionally noted potential adverse effects, particularly in people with normal weight who engage in these eating patterns, which may include concerns about disordered eating.(Katsarou, 2021)

However, several of the above reviews mention that the attrition rate in studies of IER vs CER are typically similar. Thus, if anyone believes following an IER protocol will lead to greater adherence this should definitely be considered. It is possible with more research we will find other tangible benefits of fasting protocols similar to those seen in mice studies, but at this point in time the evidence base is not strong enough to support recommending prolonged fasting to support better health. Additionally, fasting protocols can yield side effects such as hunger, poor sleep, irritability, fainting, and others, and it’s recommended that children, adolescents, the elderly, pregnant or lactating women, lean individuals, and individuals vulnerable to eating disorders do not engage in fasting protocols.(Aoun, 2020)

Tip: If you are dieting and intend to go on vacation, this can be an excellent time to take a break from caloric restriction and attempt to eat at maintenance or a slight caloric surplus. This should allow the vacation to be more enjoyable and then you can resume dieting after the vacation with renewed vigor. Similarly, if you feel run down from the dieting process this can be a good time to practice eating at maintenance to allow yourself to recharge and to reinforce practices to keep the weight off once dieting is complete.

Note: One concept that has emerged in the fitness world is the notion of “dietary refeeds”. This falls under an IER paradigm. The idea here is to be in a caloric deficit for say 5 days and then eat at maintenance or slightly above maintenance for 2 days (generally by adding in carbohydrates). This can serve several purposes, including refilling glycogen stores to aid exercise sessions, allowing easier adherence to a dietary strategy (particularly for people who tend to eat more on the weekends), and possibly even restoring some of the compensatory changes the body makes when undergoing adaptive thermogenesis.

There is not much direct research studying this approach. In 2020, one published study did evaluate dietary refeeds, comparing a 25% caloric deficit every day of the week to a 35% deficit on 5 consecutive days followed by 2 days at maintenance, each for 7 weeks, while consuming 1.8 grams of protein per kg of body weight daily.(Campbell, 2020) Only 27 of 58 recruited patients completed the study (13 in the refeed group, 14 in the continuous group). They engaged in 4 resistance training sessions weekly. Both groups lost a similar amount of weight (3.2 kg and 3.6 kg on average in the refeed and continuous groups, respectively), but the refeed group was able to maintain dry fat-free mass more effectively (-0.2 kg vs -1.9 kg, respectively).

Thus, in this one small study, the refeed strategy was effective at maintaining non-water fat-free mass while losing weight. More research is needed but this initial result is promising.

Meal frequency

General reviews:
  • A 2016 review found increased meal frequency to be potentially beneficial for lean mass preservation in a caloric deficit (without otherwise impacting body weight or appetite).(Hutchison, 2016) Within this review the authors noted concern from one cited study indicating increased meal frequency may be metabolically harmful in a caloric surplus.
  • A 2017 review indicated there is mixed evidence from epidemiologic studies indicating that higher meal frequency aids cardiovascular disease (“CVD”) and diabetes markers, while in trials there seems to be mild benefit of increasing meal frequency on cholesterol levels, with no significant benefit on triglycerides, blood pressure, fasting glucose, or insulin.(St-Onge, 2017) Of note, many of the included trials in this review are very small.
  • A 2019 review suggested there is not much difference in weight loss with varying meal frequency though higher frequency may lead to less hunger (but also less satiety after eating), decreased protein oxidation, and more stable blood glucose & insulin levels.(Oke, 2019) More stable blood glucose and insulin is logical given caloric consumption would be spread out more with higher meal frequency; this does not contradict the prior review stating there is no impact on fasting glucose and insulin as those measurements would be obtained from a single time point and not significantly related to a prior meal.
  • A 2020 network MA including 22 RCTs found that meal frequency has no meaningful impact on body weight changes, while 2 meals vs 6 meals daily may have a small beneficial impact on waist circumference (but no benefit was seen with 3 meals vs 6 meals daily).(Schwingshackl, 2020)
  • A 2021 SR/MA of RCTs evaluating the effect of meal frequency on cardiometabolic biomarkers evaluated 21 studies and found(Abdollahi, 2021):
    • no impact on fasting glucose, insulin, hemoglobin A1c, or HOMA-IR (a measure of insulin resistance), though removing 1 outlier study yielded a significant decrease in insulin of -1.12 μU/mL when utilizing higher meal frequency
    • no impact on triglycerides
    • a benefit for total cholesterol of -6.08 mg/dL with higher meal frequency (removal of 1 outlier study makes this no longer significant)
    • a benefit for LDL cholesterol (the “bad” cholesterol) with -6.82 mg/dL with higher meal frequency (removal of 1 outlier study makes this no longer significant)
    • no effect on HDL cholesterol (the “good” cholesterol)
    • a small increase in the LDL/HDL ratio of 0.22 (this was from 3 studies with a total of only 45 participants)
    • no significant effect on free fatty acids, apolipoproteins, or leptin
  • A 2021 narrative review found that increased eating frequency was associated with lower adiposity and metabolic syndrome risk but this may be due to increased eating frequency correlating with better diet quality.(Garcidueñas-Fimbres, 2021)
  • A 2023 SR/MA including 16 trials found that eating frequency had no impact on body composition or various cardiometabolic risk factors.(Blazey, 2023)

Tip: This same review also examined the role of eating speed and found a decreased eating speed was associated with better outcomes regarding adiposity and metabolic syndrome risk.(Garcidueñas-Fimbres, 2021) Thus, for individuals who are attempting to lose weight it may be helpful to eat more slowly; a separate review has also found this association.(Kolay, 2021) There are a variety of tools out there to help with decreasing portion sizes (ie, small utensils, glasses shaped in a specific way to slow the pace of drinking, etc), though it seems these do not work well in isolation.(Vargas-Alvarez, 2021)

Perhaps using these strategies with a cognitive effort to eat more slowly will prove more effective. Other tricks include using your off-hand (ie, your left hand if you are naturally right-handed), chewing more with each bite, putting your utensils down between bites, or restricting yourself to a small first portion size and waiting 15 minutes prior to consuming a second portion. Eating with others and having a conversation during a meal can also work very well. Ultimately all of these strategies provide more time for various gut hormones to release and send signals to the brain where they decrease hunger and increase satiety; this can lead to a natural decrease in overall caloric consumption for people who would otherwise eat/drink too quickly for these signals to take effect.

Conclusions regarding meal frequency:

Given the lack of strong findings above, the fact that there is no technical definition of what constitutes a meal(St-Onge, 2017) (and thus hard to do well-designed consistent trials), and the fact that while many people report having 3 meals daily their actual daily intake does not reflect this(Gill, 2015), there is not a strong enough literature base at this time to recommend a specific meal frequency. As stated in Lesson 4, spreading protein intake throughout the day will likely benefit muscle protein synthesis. Thus, I recommend a minimum of two distinct protein (and hence meal) feedings on a daily basis, and there may be additional benefit with three.

Note: Below in the TRE section I include several reviews that indicate a benefit to consuming calories in a restricted window, which would seem to necessitate fewer meals, yet some of the evidence above weakly suggests more meals may be beneficial. This may seem confusing but can be consistent with the below TRE literature when considering:

  • some of the above literature compared 1 meal daily to multiple meals while most TRE protocols still allow 2-3 meals daily
  • some of the above literature evaluating 2-3 meals had them consumed far apart (ie, 8am, 1pm, 6pm, plus a snack), such that there was no prolonged fasting window – this is not consistent with TRE

Thus, these findings should not be considered inconsistent with the TRE findings discussed below.

Timing of meals

There has been emerging evidence that suggests eating at consistent daily times with similar intake throughout(Aqeel, 2020) or more intake preferentially early in the day may lead to better health outcomes.(Almoosawi, 2016; Pot, 2016; Patterson, 2017; Boege, 2020; Dashti, 2020; Zerón-Rugerio, 2020) This latter finding extends to those with diabetes.(Han, 2020) This is thought to be related to the various circadian rhythms in the body, the most prominent one being from the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus, with additional ones found in peripheral organs as well.(Chaix, 2019) This leads to various metabolic changes throughout the day, one example being decreased postprandial glucose and insulin levels in the morning relative to the evening, possibly due to improved insulin sensitivity in the morning.(Leung, 2020) There may also be greater carbohydrate oxidation in the morning and greater lipid oxidation in the evening.(Boege, 2020)

Importance of breakfast consumption?

There is not much strong evidence indicating a significant benefit to breakfast consumption, though it is possible that uncontrolled late night eating may mitigate benefits that would otherwise be seen in intervention trials(Gwin, 2018) Various reviews include:

  • A 2020 MA of 7 cohort studies did find that breakfast skipping was associated with a 22% increased risk of CVD and a 25% increased risk of all-cause mortality (“ACM”) relative to consuming breakfast regularly; however, the authors noted that breakfast skipping is associated with many different unhealthy dietary and lifestyle behaviors, and thus it is possible residual confounding variables account for the observed associations.(Chen, 2020)
  • A 2020 SR/MA of RCTs evaluating people assigned to breakfast or no breakfast groups found no significant differences in any measured anthropometric outcomes.(Bohan Brown, 2020)
  • This was mirrored in a separate 2020 SR/MA, though 3 studies with a total of 92 subjects did find an association of increased LDL cholesterol (+9.24 mg/dL) in individuals who skipped breakfast; due to the lack of multiple hypothesis testing correction, small sample size, and the association of breakfast skipping with some unhealthy nutritional components it’s unclear if this cholesterol finding represents a legitimate physiologic aspect of skipping breakfast.(Bonnett, 2020)
  • A 2020 review on the topic of breakfast concluded we need more trials to help determine if breakfast is beneficial; there are associations between breakfast intake and beneficial cardiovascular outcomes but when non-habitual breakfast consumers begin to consume breakfast regularly they typically gain weight.(Santos, 2020) It may ultimately come down to whether or not eating breakfast helps or hinders any given individual with maintaining an overall healthy diet.
  • A 2021 SR/MA found breakfast skipping is associated with weight gain in retrospective and prospective cohort studies; however, there are many known confounding effects, most studies do not adjust for all of these, and there are quite possibly additional unmeasured confounding variables beyond this.(Wicherski, 2021)
  • A 2021 SR evaluating breakfast inclusion or exclusion in youth in randomized controlled trials and longitudinal  intervention studies found that including a breakfast led to a significant improvement in overall diet quality while the trials did not show any significant differences in body weight, which implies any long-term changes may be due to the overall healthier diet associated with those who consume breakfast.(Ricotti, 2021)
  • A 2023 SR/MA including 11 studies (10 trials, 1 cohort study) found skipping breakfast led to a small decrease in weight and an increase in LDL of ~10 mg/dL, but in studies >4 weeks duration these impacts were significantly attenuated. There was no impact on BMI, waist circumference, blood pressures, measures of glycemia, or non-LDL cholesterol or triglyceride metrics.(Yu, 2023)

Research evaluating caloric intake distribution throughout the day

While there may not be much evidence indicating a significant benefit to breakfast consumption, there is a considerable body of literature suggesting moving caloric intake earlier in the day can be health-promoting:

  • One study randomized women with an average BMI of 33 (without diabetes) to two different isocaloric protocols: either 700/500/200 kcal (calories) for breakfast/lunch/dinner or 200/500/700 kcal for breakfast/lunch/dinner.(Jakubowicz, 2013) The group eating more kcals at breakfast had better results with triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, insulin, had lower ghrelin (the “hunger” hormone) throughout the day, and had lower postprandial glucose and insulin levels after the 700 kcal meal.
  • A different study took 420 people with overweight or obesity and put them on a weight loss program based on the Mediterranean diet, a moderate physical activity intervention, and cognitive behavioral therapy while also providing other education.(Garaulet, 2013) No advice was given with respect to the time of day they should eat or when they should consume most of their calories. Lunch was the largest meal of the day for this group and people who ate lunch earlier had better weight loss outcomes starting at week 5 of the intervention despite no differences in reported energy intake or energy expenditure.
  • A rather interesting study not only considered when people eat most of their calories but also the relationship of this to when they typically wake up and go to sleep.(Xiao, 2019) Here the authors looked at >800 adults and considered the midpoint of time in bed as a cutoff; those whose midpoint was earlier than the median midpoint were considered as “early chronotypes” and those whose midpoint was later than the median midpoint were considered as “late chronotypes”. They found that while a higher percentage of energy intake early in the day was associated with reduced odds of overweight & obesity, this was more strongly seen in those with an early chronotype. Similarly, they found that greater energy intake at night was associated with higher odds of overweight and obesity to a greater degree in those with a late chronotype. They found this mainly associated with carbohydrate and protein but not fat intake.

Note: I suspect over time with more research we will find this concept of chronotype and the relation of normal wake & sleep times to eating patterns has a fairly significant role in the health implications of “chrononutrition”. At this point in time the vast majority of studies evaluating the timing of nutrition do not consider normal wake and sleep times. Future studies should consider this as chronotype may serve as a significant confounding variable otherwise. Indeed, people with earlier chronotypes generally have lower chronic disease risk and healthier biomarker status.(Lotti, 2022) Much more research remains to be done to elucidate the full role that chronotype plays on the implication of eating times for overall health.

  • Another study took ~80 women with BMI between 27-35 who normally were late-night eaters and split them into two groups; one group ate their evening meal between 19:00-19:30 and the other between 22:30-23:00.(Madjd, 2021) Both groups were placed on a diet with a 500-1,000 kcal deficit, plenty of fruits/vegetables/fiber, and encouraged to build up to 60 minutes of exercise on 5 days a week. Both groups had improvements in a variety of health markers but the early evening group had better overall weight loss (-6.8 kg vs -4.85 kg) as well as better improvements in waist circumference, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR (a measure of insulin resistance).
  • In contrast to some of the above findings, an observational study using data from the American Time Use Survey found a longer daily eating window and a shorter time period between eating and sleep were both associated with a decreased prevalence of obesity.(O’Connor, 2021) However, the authors noted multiple seemingly valid reasons why underreporting of food intake as well as inaccurate reporting of time of eating were likely in this data set.
  • A 2021 SR/MA of observational studies in children and adolescents found relatively weak evidence indicating positive associations between eating around bedtime as well as skipping evening meals (which may have still allowed for bedtime snacks) and increased odds of having obesity.(Zou, 2021)
  • A 2022 SR including 9 randomized controlled trials found that distributing more calories earlier in the day lead to mildly improved weight loss, LDL-cholesterol, fasting glucose, and HOMA-IR (a measure of insulin resistance).(Young, 2022)

Conclusions regarding meal timing

Thus, at this point most of the evidence indicates a benefit to eating the majority of your calories early in the day, though breakfast does not seem imperative. However, it is not yet clear exactly how to define “early” (ie, based on the time of day or based on the relation to when a person wakes up) or what proportion of your calories should be consumed early to yield greater benefits. It’s also not clear if this would change when consuming calories in a deficit, maintenance, or surplus. Additionally, these studies have not included any intense exercise interventions; for people who do workout in the evening it is conceivable these results may not apply to the same degree. Nonetheless, the research overall is promising that greater intake earlier in the day will yield health benefits.

Time-restricted eating (“TRE”)

TRE, or the concept of consuming all of your calories in a specific window of time, has become quite popular in the general public, with some people choosing to consume all of their calories in one large meal and others choosing to consume all of their calories in timed windows ranging from 4-12 hours. There is evidence collectively that this may influence the various circadian rhythms alluded to above and thus may benefit health beyond simply leading to decreased caloric consumption.(Waldman, 2020)

Some reviews of TRE studies have shown small benefits regarding weight and metabolic outcomes, but these reviews have included Ramadan studies.(Rothschild, 2014; Pellegrini, 2020) Given that Ramadan goes directly against the circadian rhythm with respect to the time of eating it is possible this will underscore the actual benefits of a TRE approach.

Reviews of TRE studies

Here I will highlight findings of reviews of TRE studies that do not incorporate Ramadan. If you do not wish to read through findings of each review, I include a summary paragraph at the end of this TRE section. The following figure from one of the below reviews demonstrates some of the possible benefits of TRE in individuals with components of metabolic syndrome.

an image showing some of the benefits of time-restricted eating
Reproduced from: Świątkiewicz I, Woźniak A, Taub PR. Time-Restricted Eating and Metabolic Syndrome: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Nutrients. 2021 Jan 14;13(1):221. doi: 10.3390/nu13010221. PMID: 33466692; PMCID: PMC7828812.

In a 2020 SR/MA with TRE studies published through 4/3/2020, 19 studies were evaluated (11 RCTs, 2 non-randomized controlled trials, 1 historically controlled trial, 5 trials with one group using a pretest-posttest design).(Moon, 2020) In total there were 475 subjects, 10 studies with healthy individuals and 9 studies with participants with metabolic abnormalities (8 studies in people with overweight/obesity, 1 study in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease). Results when looking at all studies include:

  • 12 studies examined the impact on weight loss and found a small impact (-0.90 kg)
    • looking just at the studies with people with metabolic abnormalities yielded a larger impact (-3.19 kg vs no impact in healthy individuals), however removing one influential study negated the impact
  • 10 studies examined the impact on body composition, finding an overall decrease in body fat percentage (-0.56%) and fat mass (-1.58 kg)
    • with subgroup analysis in 5 healthy studies there was a decrease in fat mass of -0.79 kg but in the 2 studies with metabolic abnormalities only one found a decrease
    • there was no change in fat-free mass
  • 6 studies examined blood pressure and found no impact on diastolic blood pressure but did find a decrease in systolic blood pressure of -3.07 mmHg
    • in 4 studies with metabolic abnormalities the systolic blood pressure decrease was -5.42 mmHg
    • in 2 studies with healthy subjects there was no decrease
  • 10 studies examined fasting glucose concentrations and there was a decrease of -2.96 mg/dL
    • in 5 studies with metabolic abnormalities there was a statistically significant decrease of -2.29 mg/dL
    • in 5 studies with healthy participants there was a non-statistically significant decrease of -3.65 mg/dL
  • 14 studies examined changes in lipid profiles and found a decrease in triglycerides of -11.60 mg/dL but without significant results in the healthy or metabolically unhealthy subgroups (-13.22 mg/dL and -7.12 mg/dL, respectively, but with wide confidence intervals), and there was no change in HDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol
  • When considering only the 11 RCTs and 3 controlled clinical trials without randomization:
    • there was no effect on weight change
    • fat mass decreased -1.27 kg
    • there was no change in fat-free mass, fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, or LDL cholesterol

A 2020 SR found 22 TRE trials published through September, 2020 and provided general descriptions of the literature.(Adafer, 2020):

  • Trials lasted from 4 days to 4 months, had sample sizes of 8 to 105, 10 were RCTs, 3 were non-randomized controlled studies, and 8 were single-arm non-controlled trials. The authors noted many more trials that are larger were in progress at the time of their data search.
  • 50% of the trials used an 8 hour feeding window, some used an earlier eating window during the day but most used a later window or a self-selected window.
  • Some purposefully utilized isocaloric protocols while most allowed as much food consumption during the eating window as desired.
  • Of 10 studies that reported adherence, 8 studies had >80% adherence and the remaining 2 studies had >70% adherence. Adherence was mainly self-reported. One trial that employed a 12-week intervention found that 63% of participants continued to engage in TRE to some degree 16 months after the intervention ended.
  • Studies reporting changes in hunger found no negative influence from TRE.
  • On average caloric consumption decreased 20% with TRE despite participants not being instructed to decrease their intake.
  • In various studies there were improvements in fat loss, systolic blood pressure, glycemic control and insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and adiponectin levels.

In a 2021 SR/MA included only randomized controlled trials published through 10/1/2020 that evaluated early-TRE (“eTRE”, meaning caloric consumption was limited to the earlier portion of the day).(Pureza, 2021) Nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis (n = 264 participants) & eight studies were included in the quantitative analysis (n = 184 participants). Results include:

  • 7 studies evaluated fasting blood glucose and found a decrease of -2.75 mg/dL
    • removing one study yielding heterogeneity increased the magnitude to -3.27 mg/dL
    • a similar result was seen in studies with weight loss and weight maintenance, though there was evidence of publication bias
  • 6 studies evaluated insulin levels and found no differences
  • 4 studies evaluated HOMA-IR, all with weight maintenance, and found a small decrease with eTRE (-0.50 μU/mL)
  • 3 studies evaluated ghrelin levels (a hormone that stimulates hunger) and found no differences
  • 6 studies evaluated triglycerides and found no differences
  • 3 studies evaluated total cholesterol and found no collective difference, however in the subgroup of studies in weight maintenance there was an increase of 11.18 mg/dL
    • of note, this subgroup included 2 studies with a longer fasting duration of 18 hours and this extended fasting may have caused an increase in cholesterol measurements
  • 4 studies evaluated HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and there were no differences

A 2021 review of TRE studies and their impact on various aspects of metabolic health found 13 trials and collectively described(Gabel, 2021):

  • In trials allowing ad libitum intake there was a 1-4% loss in body weight in subjects with overweight or obesity corresponding to a ~350-500 calorie deficit daily. Weight loss was not seen in studies that incorporated exercise. It’s not clear if the length of the eating window or time of day of the eating window was influential for weight loss. Body fat and fat-free mass loss was similar compared to other dieting protocols, and there was no loss of visceral fat mass.
  • Improvements in blood pressure were noted in studies where people had borderline hypertension.
  • Cholesterol levels and triglycerides were not generally affected, but most studies included individuals with normal levels at baseline.
  • There was no influence on inflammatory markers. However, there was a benefit seen for markers of oxidative stress.
  • Regarding adverse effects, there was no increase in minor side effects such as headaches and constipation throughout the interventions. There was also no negative impact on sleep.
  • There were no increases in disordered eating symptoms in one study that gauged this, though that study excluded individuals with a history of eating disorders at baseline.

A 2021 narrative review focusing on the impact of TRE in 13 studies (some with multiple publications) of individuals with various components of metabolic syndrome found(Świątkiewicz , 2021):

  • Generally, adherence was >80%.
  • A loss of 3-4% in body weight, body fat percentage, and waist circumference was seen along with a decrease in visceral fat in some studies, but some studies found no loss in body fat and some had a loss in lean body mass.
  • Caloric consumption decreased 9-20%.
  • Some studies found improvement in markers of glucose control, lipid profiles, and blood pressure, but none of these findings were universal.
  • Various studies found subjective improvement in sleep, energy level, hunger at bedtime, quality of life, and well-being.
  • There were no serious adverse events and mild side effects typically diminished throughout the interventions.
  • Barriers included work schedules, family commitments, and social events.

A 2021 SR of TRE studies included people with normal weight, overweight, or obesity; most of the individuals were healthy at baseline.(Kang, 2021)  The authors found:

  • overall compliance was measured in 10 studies and was 88%
  • TRE participants consumed an average of 2,245 kcal/day compared to 2,383 kcal/day in the control groups
  • Anthropometric outcomes:
    • body mass: 18 of 22 studies found a decrease which averaged 1.9 kg over 1 week to 3 months
    • BMI: 6 of 9 studies found a decrease and the remaining 3 had a trend towards a decrease
      • It’s unclear if decreased water weight due to having a longer fasting interval before morning measurements may have contributed to a decrease in body weight and BMI.
    • body fat: 10 of 15 studies found a decrease
    • fat-free mass: of 11 studies evaluating this, 3 found a decrease, 1 found an increase (this trial included resistance training), and 7 found no change
  • Glycemia outcomes:
    • fasting glucose: of 16 studies, 5 found a decrease, 10 found no change, 1 found an increase
    • fasting insulin: of 15 studies, 3 found a decrease, 12 found no effect
    • insulin sensitivity: of 10 studies, 4 found an increase, 4 found no change, 1 found a decrease (I realize this does not add up to 10, perhaps there is a typo in the publication)
  • Lipid outcomes:
    • fasting triglycerides: of 16 studies, 4 found a decrease, 11 found no change, 1 found an increase
    • fasting cholesterol: of 12 studies, 1 found a decrease, 9 found no change, 2 found an increase
    • cholesterol subfractions: of 13 studies, 9 found no change in HDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol, 1 found a decrease in LDL cholesterol, 3 found an increase in HDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol
    • Hormones:
      • cortisol: of 7 studies, 4 found no effect, 3 found a decrease
      • testosterone: of 4 studies, 3 found a decrease, 1 found no change
    • Physical performance:
      • muscle strength and power:of  6 studies, 3 found no change, 3 found a similar increase between TRE and control groups
      • aerobic fitness: 3 studies all found no change
      • daily steps: 5 studies all found no change

This review evaluated 24 trials, finding that TRE generally leads to 1-4% weight loss in people with overweight or obesity and may have some benefit on blood glucose control but the evidence is mixed and more studies are needed.(Tsitsou, 2022)

A 2022 SR/MA of 8 TRE trials in adults with overweight or obesity found that this led to a 1.5 kg greater weight loss than the non-TRE groups, a 1.1 kg greater loss of body fat, and a 1.6 cm greater decrease in waist circumference, with no overall change in lean body mass.(Huang, 2022) The subset of studies that employed the TRE period earlier in the day had slightly better outcomes (-2.5 kg weight loss, -1.4 kg body fat loss). One study incorporated physical activity; excluding this study there was a 0.7 kg decrease in lean body mass with TRE.

A 2023 SR/MA of 9 TRE trials in people with overweight and obesity found TRE led to(Chen, 2023):

  • a 1.28 kg decrease in body weight relative to controls (in 9 trials), a 0.34 decrease in BMI (5 trials), a 0.72 decrease in fat mass (7 trials), no difference in lean body mass (5 trials)
  • no difference in systolic blood pressure but a 2.26 mmHg decrease in diastolic blood pressure (5 trials)
  • no difference in measures of glucose control (6 trials)
  • no difference in cholesterol levels (5 trials)
  • no difference in waist circumference (5 trials)

A 2023 SR/MA of 9 TRE trials in people with overweight and obesity found TRE led to(Sun, 2023):

  • a 1.40 kg further decrease in body weight relative to controls
  • small decreased in body fat percentage (0.73%, 5 studies) and waist circumference (1.87 cm, 6 studies) relative to controls
  • no improvement in blood pressure, lipids, or glucose control (4-6 studies each)

A 2023 MA including 7 studies of people with overweight and obesity found that performing TRE with caloric restriction compared to caloric restriction alone led to a 2.1 kg greater loss of body weight, 0.75 kg greater loss of fat mass, and a 1.3 cm greater decrease in waist circumference.(Črešnovar, 2023)

A 2024 SR/network MA of 27 trials found no differences in metabolic outcomes when comparing 18:6, 16:8, and 14:10 fasting:eating windows.(Nie, 2023)

A 2024 SR/MA including 22 trials found that TRE compared to a control group led to small decreases in BMI (-0.56) and body weight (-0.48 kg), while fasting glucose slightly increased and HDL cholesterol slightly increased. There were no changes in waist circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides, or LDL cholesterol. (Qi, 2024)

Combining TRE with resistance training

As one of the concerns with TRE is decreased muscle protein synthesis from a decreased meal frequency, I have highlighted the various published TRE studies that incorporate resistance training below (as resistance training should help maintain lean body mass with any given dieting or nutrition scheme). Collectively, as has been reviewed(Aragon, 2022), these generally show that engaging in TRE while performing a resistance training program does not lead to lean body mass loss, while we do not yet have good data comparing different timing periods for the TRE itself when including resistance training (ie, placing the eating window early vs. late in the day).

In 2016 Tinsley et al. published an 8 week trial with 28 individuals split into a TRE or normal diet (“ND”) group with a full body workout being done 3 days weekly.(Tinsley, 2017) The TRE group employed a 4-hour feeding window between 4 pm and midnight on nontraining days. N=10 completed the trial in the TRE group and n=8 completed the trial in the ND group. There were no significant differences in body weight, body composition, muscle cross-sectional area, or strength between the two groups at the completion of the trial. However, the ND group did gain 2.3 kg of lean body mass compared to a loss 0.2 kg in the TRE group. Of note, the protein intake averaged 1.4 grams/kilogram (g/kg) for the ND group but only 1.0 g/kg for the TRE group, which may have hampered the TRE group’s results.

In 2016 Moro et al. published an 8-week trial with n=34 resistance-trained males split into a TRE group and a normal diet (“ND”) group, both consuming maintenance calories.(Moro, 2016) The TRE group consumed calories at 1 pm (40%), 4 pm (25%), and 8 pm (35%). The ND group consumed calories at 8 am (25%), 1 pm (40%), and 8 pm (35%). Three exercise sessions were done weekly between 4-6 pm. The TRE group lost more body fat (-16.4% vs -2.8%) while both groups maintained their fat-free mass. The TRE group had more substantial beneficial changes in blood glucose, insulin, triglycerides, and adiponectin. The only potential negative findings in the TRE group (from a muscle hypertrophy standpoint) that were not seen in the ND group were decreases in total testosterone and IGF-1, though these values were still within normal reference ranges.

In 2021 a follow-up study was published where this trial was extended for 10 additional months. There were n=10 in each group who continued the trial. Contact was made monthly with the participants to help ensure adherence. After the full year time span, differences in the TRE group compared to the ND group included:

  • a loss of 3.4% body mass, 11.8% fat mass, and 18.8% visceral adipose tissue
  • a loss of 4.3% arm cross-sectional area and 2.90% thigh cross-sectional area, indicating a loss of skeletal muscle
    • there was a decrease in serum testosterone of 16.8% and IGF-1 of 14.3% which may help account for the skeletal muscle loss
    • however, both groups gained similar amounts of strength in the bench press and leg press
  • a 24.9% decrease in leptin and a 21.3% increase in adiponectin
  • a 9.9% decrease in fasting glucose, a 31.7% decrease in insulin, a 8.3% decrease in LDL cholesterol, a 21.0% decrease in triglycerides, and a 15.4% increase in HDL cholesterol
  • a decrease of several inflammatory markers (IL-6 by 25.22%, IL-1β by 22.97%, and TNF-α by 13.88%)

In 2019 Tinsley et al. published an 8-week trial in resistance-trained females with an 8-hour TRE window from 12:00-20:00.(Tinsley, 2019) Protein intake was at least 1.4 grams/kilogram/day (g/kg/d) and they aimed for a 250 kcal/d deficit. The participants trained 3 times weekly with training sessions between 12:00-18:00. There were 2 separate TRE arms as well as a control arm. One of the TRE arms was given supplemental β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) (thought to decrease muscle protein breakdown when in a catabolic state). The intention to treat analysis had n=40 while the per protocol analysis had n=24. There were no differences in results between the groups, indicating TRE did not inhibit skeletal muscle hypertrophy or strength acquisition, and HMB did not prove beneficial.

In 2020 Stratton et al. published a 4-week trial with a TRE group (n=13, 8-hour window from 12-8 pm or 1-9 pm) compared to a normal diet group (n=13) combined with resistance training and a 25% caloric deficit with at least 1.8 grams/kilogram of daily protein.(Stratton, 2020) While various changes were seen in both groups over time, between the two groups there were no meaningful differences regarding body composition, strength gains, muscular hypertrophy, testosterone, leptin, or adiponectin. TRE did not negatively impact the response to training (regarding the metrics mentioned above), recovery, energy, or hunger; however, the surveys for the latter items were completed during the feeding window which likely impacted the measurements.

In 2020 McAllister et al. published a study with n=16 healthy male firefighters undergoing TRE for 10 hours (time period not specified) for 6 weeks while following a resistance training program. Decreases were seen in advanced oxidation protein products (~31%) as well as advanced glycation end products (~25%), both of which are thought to have negative health effects. No differences were seen in the hunger hormones, cholesterol or glucose/insulin levels, or other inflammatory markers. Without a control group it’s unclear if the observed improvements were due to the TRE, the resistance training program, or some other mechanism.

In 2021 Kotarsky et al. published a study with n=21 physically inactive adults aged 35-60 with overweight or obesity (BMI 25.0-34.9) undergoing a normal diet (n=10) or TRE for 8 hours (12:00-8:00pm, n=11) while following a concurrent resistance training and aerobic training program. The TRE group lost 4 kg weight compared to none for the normal eating group, lost 2% body fat compared to 1% for the normal eating group, and did not lose any lean mass in the process.

In 2021 Gonzalez et al. published a study with n=16 healthy male firefighters undergoing TRE for 10 hours (time period not specified) for 7 weeks while following a resistance training program (2 days most weeks). Overall, there were no changes in anthropometric outcomes or muscular performance, there was a decrease in absolute and relative VO2 peak (though the authors provide a legitimate rationale for why this may not be a valid finding), and there was an improvement in absolute and relative ventilatory threshold; the authors believe this improvement may be due to changes in substrate utilization while following a TRE protocol. Overall, there were not many changes and there was no control group to help determine what impact TRE itself had.

In 2021 Ribeiro et al. published a study with n=24 physically active adults with overweight or obesity aged 18-40 in an 8-week trial including 12 individuals in a CER group and 12 individuals in a TRE group, both at a 20% calorie dialy deficit and incorporating 1 hour of exercise (aerobic training, resistance training, and balance/proprioception training) three times weekly. Both groups lost similar amounts of weight, waist circumference, and fat mass, but the TRE group did not lose any fat-free mass, total body water, or skeletal muscle mass while the CER group lost 2.6%, 2.2%, and 2.3%, respectively. There were no major differences in cardiometabolic markers or leptin, but only the CER group had an increase in cortisol levels (the “stress hormone”).

In 2021 Isenmann et al. published a trial comparing TRE to a macronutrient-based diet with no time restrictions over a 14-week period. The TRE dietary composition was based on general dietary guidelines with ad-libitum intake, while the macronutrient-based diet was designed to include higher protein levels and a 500 calorie deficit. Additionally, the TRE group was supposed to consume all calories between 12pm-8pm. Both groups exercised 3-4 days weekly including 2 resistance training sessions weekly. The TRE group naturally decreased their caloric intake by 400-500 calories per day, and overall there were no differences between the two groups regarding total calories as well as carbohydrate, protein, or fat intake daily. Additionally, both groups had beneficial changes in body composition with no loss of lean body mass and no significant differences between the two groups.

In 2023 Correia et al published a trial where 18 young adult males with prior resistance training experience performed a 3-day per week resistance training program for 30 days with an 8-hour eating window from 1-9 pm and also for 30 days with no defined eating window. There were no differences in body composition outcomes and minimal differences in various measures of strength and force development.

Summary of the TRE evidence

So what does this body of research suggest overall? From a health standpoint most of these studies show that following a TRE protocol leads to a natural reduction in caloric intake and subsequent weight loss (from body fat without loss of lean body mass). Beyond this, several (though not all) studies show benefits for glucose and insulin levels, cholesterol, and blood pressure. These are seen across varying protocols in different populations of individuals. Of note, several trials were in metabolically healthy individuals; this may preclude seeing benefits that would be seen in metabolically unhealthy individuals. Additionally, it’s important to keep in mind that all of these studies were small, and most were done for ≤8 weeks. This would make it harder to find statistically significant differences and thus may underscore the overall effects.

Importantly, there do not seem to be many significant adverse effects, hunger levels do not increase, sleep is not negatively affected, and adherence is typically >80%. All of this is positive. However, caution must be taken when drawing strong conclusions from a small body of research that includes small trials of relatively short duration; the only trial of 1 year duration listed above included 10 people in each group. Additionally, some of the trials do show a decrease in testosterone concentrations (though not to abnormally low levels); it’s unclear what impact this may have on lean body mass long-term.

Thus, overall, TRE seems quite promising and at this point can likely be considered a viable dietary strategy, possibly with significant benefits for health and dieting purposes, but until larger trials are completed, I believe it is premature to provide strong recommendations to follow a TRE protocol. Additionally, certain medical conditions or medications may make prolonged fasting periods dangerous; consider consulting with your healthcare provider prior to making any drastic dietary changes if this is a concern.

Note: In some trials compliance was an issue at times when the eating window was earlier in the day because this precluded social eating at night. As discussed earlier in this lesson there is evidence that shifting caloric intake earlier in the day leads to health benefits, and this may also extend to TRE, but benefits have also been seen in TRE trials that started midday. Thus, if a person wants to try TRE and use a feeding window that includes evening social events to aid compliance, I do not see any particular reason to discourage this at this time given these trials still collectively show benefit.

Tip: Anecdotally many people find TRE helps to stabilize/control hunger levels, though a recent analysis found no type of intermittent fasting strategy, including TRE, benefited hunger levels relative to CER.(Elsworth, 2023) It is likely that TRE will need to be used for several days or even ≥1 week before physiologic adjustments in appetite/hunger stabilize. Thus, if attempting TRE, I would commit to it for at least 1 week prior to giving up on it as a viable strategy.


There are several different aspects of “chrononutrition” as discussed above. TRE seems like a valid approach that can be employed with resistance training as long as protein intake is sufficiently high. IER additionally seems valid and may aid compliance with a diet. If doing this I would prioritize protein intake on the restricting days. Eating at regular times is likely beneficial for overall health and consuming most of your calories earlier in the day also seems beneficial, though a conclusive benefit to adding in breakfast for individuals who prefer to skip it has not been found. Research thus far does not promote extended fasting in humans, though more research is needed. Additionally, more research is warranted relating the timing of nutrition to when people typically wake up and go to sleep.

Most of this research does not consider people who are actively exercising; for those who exercise in the evening it may make more sense to consume calories in the evening. Anyone with medical conditions that may preclude fasting periods should discuss these dieting strategies with their healthcare provider. People who perform shift work, particularly night shifts, may minimize their metabolic risks by eating at similar times each day; more research needs to be done regarding time-restricted eating protocols in night shift workers.

Click here to proceed to Lesson 13


  1. Abdollahi S, Kazemi A, de Souza RJ, Clark CCT, Soltani S. The effect of meal frequency on biochemical cardiometabolic factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3170-3181. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.038. Epub 2021 Jan 11. PMID: 33485709.
  2. Adafer R, Messaadi W, Meddahi M, Patey A, Haderbache A, Bayen S, Messaadi N. Food Timing, Circadian Rhythm and Chrononutrition: A Systematic Review of Time-Restricted Eating’s Effects on Human Health. Nutrients. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):3770. doi: 10.3390/nu12123770. PMID: 33302500; PMCID: PMC7763532.
  3. Allaf M, Elghazaly H, Mohamed OG, Fareen MFK, Zaman S, Salmasi AM, Tsilidis K, Dehghan A. Intermittent fasting for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 29;1(1):CD013496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013496.pub2. PMID: 33512717; PMCID: PMC8092432.
  4. Almoosawi S, Vingeliene S, Karagounis LG, Pot GK. Chrono-nutrition: a review of current evidence from observational studies on global trends in time-of-day of energy intake and its association with obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016;75(4):487-500. doi:10.1017/S0029665116000306
  5. Aoun A, Ghanem C, Hamod N, Sawaya S. The Safety and Efficacy of Intermittent Fasting for Weight Loss Nutrition Today. 2020;55(6):270-277. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000443.
  6. Aqeel MM, Guo J, Lin L, Gelfand SB, Delp EJ, Bhadra A, Richards EA, Hennessy E, Eicher-Miller HA. Temporal Dietary Patterns Are Associated with Obesity in US Adults. J Nutr. 2020 Dec 10;150(12):3259-3268. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa287. PMID: 33096568; PMCID: PMC7726125.
  7. Aragon AA, Schoenfeld BJ. Does Timing Matter? A Narrative Review of Intermittent Fasting Variants and Their Effects on Bodyweight and Body Composition. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 25;14(23):5022. doi: 10.3390/nu14235022. PMID: 36501050; PMCID: PMC9736182.
  8. Ashtary-Larky D, Bagheri R, Tinsley GM, Asbaghi O, Paoli A, Moro T. Effects of intermittent fasting combined with resistance training on body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiol Behav. 2021 Aug 1;237:113453. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113453. Epub 2021 May 11. PMID: 33984329.
  9. Blazey P, Habibi A, Hassen N, Friedman D, Khan KM, Ardern CL. The effects of eating frequency on changes in body composition and cardiometabolic health in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Nov 14;20(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01532-z. PMID: 37964316; PMCID: PMC10647044.
  10. Boege HL, Bhatti MZ, St-Onge MP. Circadian rhythms and meal timing: impact on energy balance and body weight. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021 Aug;70:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Sep 29. PMID: 32998085; PMCID: PMC7997809.
  11. Bohan Brown MM, Milanes JE, Allison DB, Brown AW. Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations. F1000Research. 2021;9:140. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22424.3.
  12. Bonnet JP, Cardel MI, Cellini J, Hu FB, Guasch-Ferré M. Breakfast Skipping, Body Composition, and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Jun;28(6):1098-1109. doi: 10.1002/oby.22791. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PMID: 32304359; PMCID: PMC7304383.
  13. Byrne NM, Sainsbury A, King NA, Hills AP, Wood RE. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADORstudy. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018;42(2):129-138. doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.206
  14. Campbell BI, Aguilar D, Colenso-Semple LM, Hartke K, Fleming AR, Fox CD, Longstrom JM, Rogers GE, Mathas DB, Wong V, Ford S, Gorman J. Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals. A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Mar 8;5(1):19. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5010019. PMID: 33467235; PMCID: PMC7739314.
  15. Chaix A, Manoogian ENC, Melkani GC, Panda S. Time-Restricted Eating to Prevent and Manage Chronic Metabolic Diseases. Annu Rev Nutr. 2019;39:291-315. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124320 Cho Y, Hong N, Kim KW, et al. The Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting to Reduce Body Mass Index and Glucose Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1645. Published 2019 Oct 9. doi:10.3390/jcm8101645
  16. Chen H, Zhang B, Ge Y, Shi H, Song S, Xue W, Li J, Fu K, Chen X, Teng W, Tian L. Association between skipping breakfast and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: A meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct;39(10):2982-2988. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 17. PMID: 32085933.
  17. Chen W, Liu X, Bao L, Yang P, Zhou H. Health effects of the time-restricted eating in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 16;10:1079250. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1079250. PMID: 36875837; PMCID: PMC9979543.
  18. Cioffi I, Evangelista A, Ponzo V, et al. Intermittent versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Transl Med. 2018;16(1):371. Published 2018 Dec 24. doi:10.1186/s12967-018-1748-4.
  19. Correia JM, Santos I, Pezarat-Correia P, Minderico C, Mendonca GV. Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Specific Exercise Performance Outcomes: A Systematic Review Including Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2020 May 12;12(5):1390. doi: 10.3390/nu12051390. PMID: 32408718; PMCID: PMC7284994.
  20. Correia JM, Santos PDG, Pezarat-Correia P, Minderico CS, Infante J, Mendonca GV. Effect of Time-Restricted Eating and Resistance Training on High-Speed Strength and Body Composition. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 6;15(2):285. doi: 10.3390/nu15020285. PMID: 36678156; PMCID: PMC9863948.
  21. Črešnovar T, Habe B, Jenko Pražnikar Z, Petelin A. Effectiveness of Time-Restricted Eating with Caloric Restriction vs. Caloric Restriction for Weight Loss and Health: Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2023 Nov 24;15(23):4911. doi: 10.3390/nu15234911. PMID: 38068769; PMCID: PMC10708501.
  22. Dashti HS, Gómez-Abellán P, Qian J, Esteban A, Morales E, Scheer FAJL, Garaulet M. Late eating is associated with cardiometabolic risk traits, obesogenic behaviors, and impaired weight loss. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct 6:nqaa264. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa264. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33022698.
  23. de Cabo R, Mattson MP. Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 16;382(3):298] [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):978]. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(26):2541-2551. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1905136
  24. Elortegui Pascual P, Rolands MR, Eldridge AL, Kassis A, Mainardi F, Lê KA, Karagounis LG, Gut P, Varady KA. A meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of alternate day fasting, the 5:2 diet, and time-restricted eating for weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Feb;31 Suppl 1:9-21. doi: 10.1002/oby.23568. Epub 2022 Nov 8. PMID: 36349432.
  25. Elsworth RL, Monge A, Perry R, Hinton EC, Flynn AN, Whitmarsh A, Hamilton-Shield JP, Lawrence NS, Brunstrom JM. The Effect of Intermittent Fasting on Appetite: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2023 Jun 1;15(11):2604. doi: 10.3390/nu15112604. PMID: 37299567.
  26. Enríquez Guerrero A, San Mauro Martín I, Garicano Vilar E, Camina Martín MA. Effectiveness of an intermittent fasting diet versus continuous energy restriction on anthropometric measurements, body composition and lipid profile in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;75(7):1024-1039. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00821-1. Epub 2020 Dec 9. PMID: 33293678.
  27. Gabel K, Cienfuegos S, Kalam F, Ezpeleta M, Varady KA. Time-Restricted Eating to Improve Cardiovascular Health. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2021 Mar 26;23(5):22. doi: 10.1007/s11883-021-00922-7. PMID: 33772388; PMCID: PMC8218778.
  28. Garaulet M, Gómez-Abellán P, Alburquerque-Béjar JJ, Lee YC, Ordovás JM, Scheer FA. Timing of food intake predicts weight loss effectiveness [published correction appears in Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Apr;37(4):624]. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(4):604-611. doi:10.1038/ijo.2012.229.
  29. Garcidueñas-Fimbres TE, Paz-Graniel I, Nishi SK, Salas-Salvadó J, Babio N. Eating Speed, Eating Frequency, and Their Relationships with Diet Quality, Adiposity, and Metabolic Syndrome, or Its Components. Nutrients. 2021 May 15;13(5):1687. doi: 10.3390/nu13051687. PMID: 34063439; PMCID: PMC8156274.
  30. Gill S, Panda S. A Smartphone App Reveals Erratic Diurnal Eating Patterns in Humans that Can Be Modulated for Health Benefits. Cell Metab. 2015;22(5):789-798. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.005.
  31. Gonzalez AE, Waldman HS, Abel MG, McCurdy KW, McAllister MJ. Impact of Time Restricted Feeding on Fitness Variables in Professional Resistance Trained Firefighters. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Apr 1;63(4):343-349. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002144. PMID: 33769400.
  32. Gu L, Fu R, Hong J, Ni H, Yu K, Lou H. Effects of Intermittent Fasting in Human Compared to a Non-intervention Diet and Caloric Restriction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Nutr. 2022 May 2;9:871682. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.871682. PMID: 35586738; PMCID: PMC9108547.
  33. Gwin JA, Leidy HJ. A Review of the Evidence Surrounding the Effects of Breakfast Consumption on Mechanisms of Weight Management. Adv Nutr. 2018;9(6):717-725. doi:10.1093/advances/nmy047.
  34. Han T, Gao J, Wang L, Li C, Qi L, Sun C, Li Y. The Association of Energy and Macronutrient Intake at Dinner Versus Breakfast With Disease-Specific and All-Cause Mortality Among People With Diabetes: The U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003-2014. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1442-1448. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2289. Epub 2020 Apr 30. PMID: 32354697.
  35. Harris L, McGarty A, Hutchison L, Ells L, Hankey C. Short-term intermittent energy restriction interventions for weight management: a
    systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2018;19(1):1-13. doi:10.1111/obr.12593.
  36. He S, WAng J, Zhang J, Xu J. Intermittent Versus Continuous Energy Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Obesity. 2021;29:108-115. doi:10.1002/oby.23023.
  37. Headland M, Clifton PM, Carter S, Keogh JB. Weight-Loss Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intermittent Energy Restriction Trials Lasting a Minimum of 6 Months. Nutrients. 2016;8(6):354. Published 2016 Jun 8. doi:10.3390/nu8060354
  38. Headland ML, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. Effect of intermittent compared to continuous energy restriction on weight loss and weight maintenance after 12 months in healthy overweight or obese adults [published correction appears in Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Apr;43(4):942]. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43(10):2028-2036. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0247-2.
  39. Headland ML, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. Impact of intermittent vs. continuous energy restriction on weight and cardiometabolic factors: a 12-month follow-up. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020;44(6):1236-1242. doi:10.1038/s41366-020-0525-7.
  40. Huang L, Chen Y, Wen S, Lu D, Shen X, Deng H, Xu L. Is time-restricted eating (8/16) beneficial for body weight and metabolism of obese and overweight adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Science & Nutrition. 2022; 00, 114. doi:10.1002/fsn3.3194
  41. Hutchison AT, Heilbronn LK. Metabolic impacts of altering meal frequency and timing – Does when we eat matter?. Biochimie. 2016;124:187-197. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2015.07.025
  42. Isenmann E, Dissemond J, Geisler S. The Effects of a Macronutrient-Based Diet and Time-Restricted Feeding (16:8) on Body Composition in Physically Active Individuals-A 14-Week Randomised Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 6;13(9):3122. doi: 10.3390/nu13093122. PMID: 34578999; PMCID: PMC8465090.
  43. Jakubowicz D, Barnea M, Wainstein J, Froy O. High caloric intake at breakfast vs. dinner differentially influences weight loss of overweight and obese women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(12):2504-2512. doi:10.1002/oby.20460.
  44. Kang J, Ratamess NA, Faigenbaum AD, Bush JA, Beller N, Vargas A, Fardman B, Andriopoulos T. Effect of Time-Restricted Feeding on Anthropometric, Metabolic, and Fitness Parameters: A Systematic Review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2021 Sep 7:1-16. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2021.1958719. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34491139.
  45. Katsarou AL, Katsilambros NL, Koliaki CC. Intermittent Energy Restriction, Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence in Humans. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;9(5):495. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050495. PMID: 33922103; PMCID: PMC8143449.
  46. Keenan S, Cooke MB, Belski R. The Effects of Intermittent Fasting Combined with Resistance Training on Lean Body Mass: A Systematic Review of Human Studies. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 6;12(8):2349. doi: 10.3390/nu12082349. PMID: 32781538; PMCID: PMC7468742.
  47. Kim KK, Kang JH, Kim EM. Updated Meta-Analysis of Studies from 2011 to 2021 Comparing the Effectiveness of Intermittent Energy Restriction and Continuous Energy Restriction. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep 30;31(3):230-244. doi: 10.7570/jomes22050. PMID: 36177730; PMCID: PMC9579470.
  48. Kolay E, Bykowska-Derda A, Abdulsamad S, Kaluzna M, Samarzewska K, Ruchala M, Czlapka-Matyasik M. Self-Reported Eating Speed Is Associated with Indicators of Obesity in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 16;9(11):1559. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111559. PMID: 34828605; PMCID: PMC8619990.
  49. Kotarsky CJ, Johnson NR, Mahoney SJ, Mitchell SL, Schimek RL, Stastny SN, Hackney KJ. Time-restricted eating and concurrent exercise training reduces fat mass and increases lean mass in overweight and obese adults. Physiol Rep. 2021 May;9(10):e14868. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14868. PMID: 34042299; PMCID: PMC8157764.
  50. Leung GKW, Huggins CE, Ware RS, Bonham MP. Time of day difference in postprandial glucose and insulin responses: Systematic review and meta-analysis of acute postprandial studies. Chronobiol Int. 2020 Mar;37(3):311-326. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1683856. Epub 2019 Nov 29. PMID: 31782659.
  51. Lotti S, Pagliai G, Colombini B, Sofi F, Dinu M. Chronotype Differences in Energy Intake, Cardiometabolic Risk Parameters, Cancer, and Depression: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Adv Nutr. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):269-281. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab115. PMID: 34549270; PMCID: PMC8803479.
  52. Ma Y, Sun L, Mu Z. Network meta-analysis of three different forms of intermittent energy restrictions for overweight or obese adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Jan;48(1):55-64. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01416-z. Epub 2023 Nov 18. PMID: 37980382.
  53. Madjd A, Taylor MA, Delavari A, Malekzadeh R, Macdonald IA, Farshchi HR. Effects of consuming later evening meal v. earlier evening meal on weight loss during a weight loss diet: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Nutr. 2021 Aug 28;126(4):632-640. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520004456. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PMID: 33172509.
  54. Mattson MP, Longo VD, Harvie M. Impact of intermittent fasting on health and disease processes. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;39:46-58. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2016.10.005.
  55. McAllister MJ, Gonzalez AE, Waldman HS. Impact of Time Restricted Feeding on Markers of Cardiometabolic Health and Oxidative Stress in Resistance-Trained Firefighters. J Strength Cond Res. 2020a Oct 30. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003860. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33136772.
  56. Moon S, Kang J, Kim SH, Chung HS, Kim YJ, Yu JM, Cho ST, Oh CM, Kim T. Beneficial Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Metabolic Diseases: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 29;12(5):1267. doi: 10.3390/nu12051267. PMID: 32365676; PMCID: PMC7284632.
  57. Moro T, Tinsley G, Bianco A, et al. Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength,
    body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):290. Published 2016 Oct 13. doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1044-0.
  58. Moro T, Tinsley G, Pacelli FQ, Marcolin G, Bianco A, Paoli A. Twelve Months of Time-restricted Eating and Resistance Training Improves Inflammatory Markers and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Dec 1;53(12):2577-2585. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002738. PMID: 34649266.
  59. Nie Z, Xu J, Cheng Y, Li Z, Zhang R, Zhang W, Zhao L. Effects of time-restricted eating with different eating windows on human metabolic health: pooled analysis of existing cohorts. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Oct 24;15(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01190-y. PMID: 37875984; PMCID: PMC10594936.
  60. O’Connor SG, Reedy J, Graubard BI, Kant AK, Czajkowski SM, Berrigan D. Circadian timing of eating and BMI among adults in the American Time Use Survey. Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Oct 20. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00983-3. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34671108.
  61. Oke R, Khadilkar A, Chiplonkar S. Meal Frequency and Time – Restricted Feeding as Strategies for Reducing Metabolic Risk : a Review. SPG BioMed. 2019;1(2). doi:10.32392/biomed.56.
  62. Patterson RE, Sears DD. Metabolic Effects of Intermittent Fasting. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37:371-393. doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064634.
  63. Pellegrini M, Cioffi I, Evangelista A, et al. Effects of time-restricted feeding on body weight and metabolism. A systematic review and
    meta-analysis [published correction appears in Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020 Feb 18;:]. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2020;21(1):17-33.
  64. Pot GK, Almoosawi S, Stephen AM. Meal irregularity and cardiometabolic consequences: results from observational and intervention studies. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016;75(4):475-486. doi:10.1017/S0029665116000239.
  65. Pureza IROM, Macena ML, da Silva Junior AE, Praxedes DRS, Vasconcelos LGL, Bueno NB. Effect of early time-restricted feeding on the metabolic profile of adults with excess weight: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr;40(4):1788-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.031. Epub 2020 Oct 23. PMID: 33139084.
  66. Qi D, Nie X, Zhang J. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Time-Restricted Eating on Metabolic Homeostasis. Angiology. 2024 Jan 16:33197241228046. doi: 10.1177/00033197241228046. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38229272.
  67. Ribeiro DE, Santiago AF, Abreu WC. Continuous Energy Restriction (CER) Plus 16/8 Time-restricted Feeding Improve Body Composition and Metabolic Parameters in Overweight and Obese, but No More Than CER Alone’. Nutrition and Healthy Aging. 2021;6(2):147-156. doi: 10.3233/NHA-2001061 Jan. 2021 : 147 – 156.
  68. Ricotti R, Caputo M, Monzani A, Pigni S, Antoniotti V, Bellone S, Prodam F. Breakfast Skipping, Weight, Cardiometabolic Risk, and Nutrition Quality in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled and Intervention Longitudinal Trials. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 23;13(10):3331. doi: 10.3390/nu13103331. PMID: 34684332; PMCID: PMC8539462.
  69. Roman YM, Dominguez MC, Easow TM, Pasupuleti V, White CM, Hernandez AV. Effects of intermittent versus continuous dieting on weight and body composition in obese and overweight people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43(10):2017-2027. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0204-0.
  70. Rothschild J, Hoddy KK, Jambazian P, Varady KA. Time-restricted feeding and risk of metabolic disease: a review of human and animal studies. Nutr Rev. 2014;72(5):308-318. doi:10.1111/nure.12104.
  71. Santos HO, Genario R, Macedo RCO, Pareek M, Tinsley GM. Association of breakfast skipping with cardiovascular outcomes and cardiometabolic risk factors: an updated review of clinical evidence. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(2):466-474. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1819768. Epub 2020 Sep 16. PMID: 32935557.
  72. Schroor MM, Joris PJ, Plat J, Mensink RP. Effects of Intermittent Energy Restriction Compared with Those of Continuous Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults. Adv Nutr. 2023 Oct 10:100130. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.10.003. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37827491.
  73. Schwingshackl L, Nitschke K, Zähringer J, Bischoff K, Lohner S, Torbahn G, Schlesinger S, Schmucker C, Meerpohl JJ. Impact of Meal Frequency on Anthropometric Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Adv Nutr. 2020 Sep 1;11(5):1108-1122. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa056. PMID: 32437566; PMCID: PMC7490164.
  74. Schwingshackl L, Zähringer J, Nitschke K, Torbahn G, Lohner S, Kühn T, Fontana L, Veronese N, Schmucker C, Meerpohl JJ. Impact of intermittent energy restriction on anthropometric outcomes and intermediate disease markers in patients with overweight and obesity: systematic review and meta-analyses. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(8):1293-1304. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1757616. Epub 2020 May 2. PMID: 32363896.
  75. Siedler MR, Lewis MH, Trexler ET, et al. The Effects of Intermittent Diet Breaks during 25% Energy Restriction on Body Composition and Resting Metabolic Rate in Resistance-Trained Females: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2023;86(1):117-132. doi: 10.5114/jhk/159960.
  76. St-Onge MP, Ard J, Baskin ML, et al. Meal Timing and Frequency: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(9):e96-e121. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000476.
  77. Stratton MT, Tinsley GM, Alesi MG, et al. Four Weeks of Time-Restricted Feeding Combined with Resistance Training Does Not Differentially Influence Measures of Body Composition, Muscle Performance, Resting Energy Expenditure, and Blood Biomarkers. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1126. Published 2020 Apr 17. doi:10.3390/nu12041126.
  78. Stratton MT, Albracht-Schulte K, Harty PS, Siedler MR, Rodriguez C, Tinsley GM. Physiological responses to acute fasting: implications for intermittent fasting programs. Nutr Rev. 2022 Feb 10;80(3):439-452. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab094. PMID: 35142356.
  79. Sun JC, Tan ZT, He CJ, Hu HL, Zhai CL, Qian G. Time-restricted eating with calorie restriction on weight loss and cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Jul 24. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01311-w. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37488260.
  80. Świątkiewicz I, Woźniak A, Taub PR. Time-Restricted Eating and Metabolic Syndrome: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Nutrients. 2021 Jan 14;13(1):221. doi: 10.3390/nu13010221. PMID: 33466692; PMCID: PMC7828812.
  81. Templeman I, Gonzalez JT, Thompson D, Betts JA. The role of intermittent fasting and meal timing in weight management and metabolic health. Proc Nutr Soc. 2020 Feb;79(1):76-87. doi: 10.1017/S0029665119000636. Epub 2019 Apr 26. PMID: 31023390.
  82. Tinsley GM, Forsse JS, Butler NK, et al. Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17(2):200-207. doi:10.1080/17461391.2016.1223173.
  83. Tinsley GM, Moore ML, Graybeal AJ, et al. Time-restricted feeding plus resistance training in active females: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(3):628-640. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz126.
  84. Tsitsou S, Zacharodimos N, Poulia KA, Karatzi K, Dimitriadis G, Papakonstantinou E. Effects of Time-Restricted Feeding and Ramadan Fasting on Body Weight, Body Composition, Glucose Responses, and Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients. 2022 Nov 11;14(22):4778. doi: 10.3390/nu14224778. PMID: 36432465; PMCID: PMC9696013.
  85. Vargas-Alvarez MA, Navas-Carretero S, Palla L, Martínez JA, Almiron-Roig E. Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2021 Jun 9;13(6):1978. doi: 10.3390/nu13061978. PMID: 34207492; PMCID: PMC8229078.
  86. Waldman HS, Renteria LI, McAllister MJ. Time-restricted feeding for the prevention of cardiometabolic diseases in high-stress occupations: a mechanistic review. Nutr Rev. 2020;78(6):459-464. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuz090.
  87. Welton S, Minty R, O’Driscoll T, et al. Intermittent fasting and weight loss: Systematic review. Can Fam Physician. 2020;66(2):117-125.
  88. Wicherski J, Schlesinger S, Fischer F. Association between Breakfast Skipping and Body Weight-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Longitudinal Studies. Nutrients. 2021 Jan 19;13(1):272. doi: 10.3390/nu13010272. PMID: 33477881; PMCID: PMC7832891.
  89. Williamson E, Moore DR. A Muscle-Centric Perspective on Intermittent Fasting: A Suboptimal Dietary Strategy for Supporting Muscle Protein Remodeling and Muscle Mass? Front Nutr. 2021 Jun 9;8:640621. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.640621. PMID: 34179054; PMCID: PMC8219935.
  90. Wren GM, Koutoukidis DA, Scragg J, Tsompanaki E, Hobson A, Jebb SA. Effect of planned pauses versus continuous energy restriction on weight loss and attrition: a systematic review. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024 Mar;32(3):454-465. doi: 10.1002/oby.23976. Epub 2024 Jan 21. PMID: 38246879.
  91. Xiao Q, Garaulet M, Scheer FAJL. Meal timing and obesity: interactions with macronutrient intake and chronotype. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43(9):1701-1711. doi:10.1038/s41366-018-0284-x.
  92. Yan S , Wang C , Zhao H , Pan Y , Wang H , Guo Y , Yao N , Li B , Cui W . Effects of fasting intervention regulating anthropometric and metabolic parameters in subjects with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Funct. 2020 May 1;11(5):3781-3799. doi: 10.1039/d0fo00287a. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PMID: 32342961.
  93. Young IE, Poobalan A, Steinbeck K, O’Connor HT, Parker HM. Distribution of energy intake across the day and weight loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2022 Dec 18:e13537. doi: 10.1111/obr.13537. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36530130.
  94. Yu J, Xia J, Xu D, Wang Y, Yin S, Lu Y, Xia H, Wang S, Sun G. Effect of skipping breakfast on cardiovascular risk factors: a grade-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 28;14:1256899. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256899. PMID: 38089630; PMCID: PMC10715426.
  95. Zerón-Rugerio MF, Díez-Noguera A, Izquierdo-Pulido M, Cambras T. Higher eating frequency is associated with lower adiposity and robust circadian rhythms: a cross-sectional study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Oct 23:nqaa282. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa282. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33094802.
  96. Zhang Q, Zhang C, Wang H, Ma Z, Liu D, Guan X, Liu Y, Fu Y, Cui M, Dong J. Intermittent Fasting versus Continuous Calorie Restriction: Which Is Better for Weight Loss? Nutrients. 2022 Apr 24;14(9):1781. doi: 10.3390/nu14091781. PMID: 35565749; PMCID: PMC9099935.
  97. Zhao J, Duan X, Zhang L, Zhao X, Yang J, Sun N, Zhao W. Comparative efficacy of energy-restricted dietary interventions in overweight and obese populations: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Mar;26(1):e13083. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13083. PMID: 38356103.
  98. Zou M, Northstone K, Perry R, Johnson L, Leary S. The association between later eating rhythm and adiposity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev. 2021 Oct 13:nuab079. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab079. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34643727.
Scroll to Top