Table of Contents
Welcome to Lesson 1. Before discussing the specifics of healthy nutrition and weight management, it is very helpful to understand the basics of metabolism. This is where calories come into play, and this is crucial for understanding what influences body weight (“BW”). So, let’s talk about burning calories.
Note: Technically, 1 Calorie = 1000 calories = 1 kilocalorie, but I will use “calorie” and “kilocalorie” (which I will shorthand with “kcal”) interchangeably, as almost all people do when talking about food. You will likely never need to convert these for any practical reason.
Any given day you burn some total number of calories. If you consume the same number of calories as you burn, your weight should be stable. Fluctuations can occur due to:
- retaining more or less water (due to variations in carbohydrate and sodium intake, stress levels, going through a menstrual cycle, etc)
- undigested food in your gut
- stool retention
- obvious factors such as wearing different clothing when you step on the scale
Total daily energy expenditure (“TDEE”)
The total amount of calories burned in any given day is referred to as the “total daily energy expenditure” (“TDEE”). This is comprised of multiple components(Melanson, 2017):
- There are the calories you burn at complete rest doing nothing, which is called either the “basal metabolic rate” (“BMR”) or “resting metabolic rate” (“RMR”). BMR is generally measured first thing in the morning while in the awake state but lying still in a dark, temperature-controlled environment after having fasted overnight. RMR can be measured under other conditions and thus will generally be higher, but these terms are often used interchangeably.
- There are the calories you burn in the process of digesting and absorbing food you eat, frequently called the “thermic effect of feeding” (“TEF”) or “dietary induced thermogenesis” (“DIT”).
- There are the calories you burn while you purposefully exercise, called different things but I will go with “exercise activity thermogenesis” (“EAT”).
- Additionally, there are calories you burn with unplanned activity, which includes rolling over in bed, fidgeting in a chair, pacing, alterations in energy utilization of different organs, etc. This is called “non-exercise activity thermogenesis” (“NEAT”).
Putting all of this together:
TDEE = RMR + TEF + EAT + NEAT
In general if we consume fewer calories than our TDEE we lose BW while if we consume more calories than our TDEE we gain BW.
Remember, energy cannot be created or destroyed. As calories are a unit of energy, at the end of the day all calories must be accounted for.
There are many different components that contribute to BW (bones, skin, other organs, fat, water, muscle, etc). These can be divided into “body fat” (“BF”) and “lean body mass” (“LBM” – everything other than BF).
Tip: While eating fewer calories than our TDEE is the key for losing BW, another consideration is what proportion of the weight we lose is LBM vs BF, as maintaining LBM (particularly skeletal muscle) is beneficial for overall health and is helpful to prevent weight regain long term.(Dulloo, 2018) Briefly, avoiding too rapid weight loss (see Lesson 3), keeping protein intake sufficiently high (see Lesson 4) and engaging in resistance training (not covered in this course) are the key steps to ensure LBM retention while BF is lost.
Now we will go through the components of TDEE in more detail.
Resting Metabolic Rate (“RMR”)
RMR is the largest contributor to TDEE & is primarily due to LBM.(Heymsfield, 2018) Total BF also contributes. Age and gender can contribute (higher in males, decreasing with age) but this seems mediated by alterations in LBM. Skeletal muscle burns more calories than BF (roughly 6 kcal/lb of skeletal muscle vs. 2 kcal/lb of BF per day), so if there are two people at the same BW but one has more LBM and the other has more BF, the former will likely burn more calories. Due to variations in organ size and possibly other unaccounted factors (ie, genetics), two people of the same size, age, and body composition can still have different RMRs. Approximate values for different organs are shown in the table below:
If you compare two people with different RMRs and they eat the same number of calories with no other differences between them, the person with the lower RMR will move to a higher BW than the person with the higher RMR. In practice there are other considerations (see discussion regarding NEAT below).
When we diet to lose weight, our RMR tends to decrease. This occurs in part due to the loss of LBM and BF. When losing a significant amount of BW some of our organs (which are very metabolically active) may decrease in size, further leading to decrease in RMR. Additionally, there is an adaptive component frequently termed adaptive thermogenesis that leads to a further decrease in RMR while actively losing weight (you can think of this as the body trying to fight to maintain its current BW); this is variable between people. Thus, some will have their RMR drop more than others in response to dieting. Of note, adaptive thermogenesis typically disappears once one is maintaining their new lower BW, so when you are not actively dieting it will trend back to what you expect from your overall new LBM and BF.(Ostendorf, 2018; Martins, 2020; Magkos, 2020)
Example: You may have read that a 3,500 kcal deficit equates to losing 1 pound of BF. So if you normally eat 2,000 kcal/day with a TDEE of 2,000 kcal/day and decrease your calories by 500 kcal per day (500 per day = 3,500 per week) to 1,500 kcal per day, you may expect to lose 1 pound of BF in 1 week. However, if your RMR drops by say 150 kcal/day, your new TDEE is 1,850 kcal/day. With your current 1,500 kcal/day diet your caloric deficit is actually 350 kcal/day. So instead of taking 7 days to lose 1 pound of BF we may expect it to take 10 days (350 kcal/day * 10 days = 3,500 kcal). However, other changes also occur (see further examples below).
Thermic Effect of Feeding (“TEF”)
You will commonly read that 1 gram of fat has 9 kcals, 1 gram of carbohydrate has 4 kcals, 1 gram of protein has 4 kcals, and you will less commonly read that 1 gram of alcohol has 7 kcals while 1 gram of fiber has ~0-2 kcals. Fiber and alcohol are discussed in lessons 7 & 8. The numbers for fats, carbohydrates, and proteins are general ballpark figures and some sources of these nutrients will have greater or fewer calories. If curious about these differences, there is an excellent overview here. However, this variability generally is quite small and it is typically fine to just use the 9/4/4 numbers, though there are some exceptions (see the tip below).
Tip: If you are looking at a nutrition label and the overall calories on the label do not match up with the stated grams of carbohydrates, protein, and fat when using the 9/4/4 numbers, this is likely due to fiber, sugar alcohols, or the 9/4/4 numbers not being accurate for that specific food. As one extreme example, let’s look at 92% cacao:
The numbers for the adjusted kcals are taken from the Atwater factors specific for cocoa. Most foods are not this extreme, but here it is clear that there is a difference of almost 40 kcals per serving when using the adjusted vs unadjusted numbers. Importantly, the nutrition label lists the corrected total calories. In general, when looking at nutrition labels the total calories should be trusted more than the sum of the components.
What these numbers do not consider is how much energy we have to use to actually digest nutrients we consume. It turns out we use little energy to digest fats (likely 2-3% of the kcals in fats are needed to digest them), more for carbohydrates (5-10%), and considerably more for protein (20-30%). For an overall diet, a lot of people average all three components to roughly 10%, meaning that the equivalent of 10% of the calories we consume are used in the process of absorbing & digesting food.(Westerterp, 2004) There are other contributing factors leading to variability (ie, insulin resistance is thought to decrease the TEF), but these are relatively small. For dieting purposes, if you eat less food your TEF will go down, so instead of having a TEF of 200 kcal while eating 2,000 kcal/day, it will drop to 150 kcal while eating 1,500 kcal/day.
Example: Back to the prior example, by going from 2,000 kcal/day to 1,500 kcal/day your TDEE drops not only to 1,850 kcal/day due to a reduction in RMR but an additional 50 kcal/day due to a reduction in TEF. Thus, your TDEE is now 1,800 kcal/day. Not a huge difference but worth knowing about, and because the total deficit is now 300 kcal/day, you may expect it to take 11-12 days to lose 1 pound of fat (300 kcal/day * 12 days = 3,600 kcal). However, other changes also occur (see further examples below).
Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (“EAT”)
There are really two components here:
- the amount of calories you burn during exercise
- the amount of calories you burn after exercise (termed “excess post-exercise oxygen consumption” (“EPOC”))
Figure illustrating physiologic rationale for EPOC
From: Clark, M., Lucett, S. McGill, E., Montel, I., Sutton, B. National Academy of Sports Medicine. (2018). NASM essentials of personal fitness training. 6th edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
A: Prior to exercise. B: When running on a treadmill an oxygen deficit develops as anaerobic pathways are utilized first. C: With continued exercise aerobic pathways turn on and oxygen utilization eventually meets demand. D: After exercise stops excess oxygen is still consumed to make up the deficit; this declines rapidly as the initial deficit is mostly replaced. E: For an extended period of time there is still a slight increase in oxygen consumption until the body returns to a physiologic resting state.
Total calories burned during exercise is hard to predict. This varies considerably depending on exercise modality, duration, intensity, individual level of fitness(Levine, 2003), and efficiency of movement. In general, resistance training without a cardiovascular component will burn considerably fewer calories than cardiovascular training. See the tip below regarding cardio machines.
In regards to EPOC, this is generally not a big contributor unless you do a lot of intense exercise (getting your heart rate up pretty high) for extended periods of time; you need to be in rather good shape to get a decent-sized contribution from EPOC.(Moniz, 2020; Panissa, 2020)
Tip: When using cardio machines do not trust the calorie counts they provide without careful thought. These generally overestimate and can do so by a factor of 2-3x.(Glave, 2018) However, you can still compare the calorie counts from one session to another to reasonably track progress.
Example: Back to the example, you started at 2,000 kcal/day intake with a TDEE of 2,000 kcal/day, decreased your intake to 1,500 kcal/day and had a drop in RMR and TEF resulting in a new TDEE of 1,800 kcal/day. If you don’t exercise at all you may expect to lose 1 pound of fat in 11-12 days. If you do exercise, any calorie you burn with the exercise gets added to your TDEE. So if you do any form of additional exercise that burns 300 kcal/day while starting your diet, your TDEE goes up to 2,100 kcal/day, and thus your daily deficit is now 2,100 – 1,500 = 600 kcal/day. You now may expect to lose 1 pound of fat in 6 days (600 kcal/day * 6 days = 3,600 kcal). However, this ignores the last factor in the equation, which is NEAT.
Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (“NEAT”)
NEAT helps explain why some people have so much more trouble losing or gaining weight than others.(Levine, 2003) This varies considerably between people at least in part due to genetics. When eating an excess of food, some people naturally tend to move around a lot more, and these people will put on less weight. Others will move around less and put on more weight. When losing weight this can manifest by making people feel more sluggish. If you have ever tried to lower your caloric intake to lose weight and find yourself feeling more “lazy”, that is most likely NEAT working against you. There is also evidence that as more weight is lost NEAT decreases further.(Rosenbaum, 2016) Counteracting NEAT can be a key factor in ensuring successful dieting (see tip below).
Tip: Lifestyle choices can be made to attempt to counteract a decrease in NEAT when dieting.(Villablanca,2015) Examples include:
- take stairs instead of the elevator and park further away from buildings
- wear a step counter of some sort (or use a smart phone) and set a minimum step count to aim for daily
- stand up and walk during commercials, march in place or pace while watching things on screens
- dance to music while relaxing
- set up a standing desk for work or obtain a pedal exerciser to use when sitting
- set a 5 or 10 minute timer on repeat and get up & move around when it goes off
Example: Back to our example; you are eating 1,500 kcal/day with a TDEE of 1,800 kcal/day (with no exercise) or 2,100 kcal/day (with exercise). Let’s say your NEAT decreases by 100 kcal/day without exercise and 150 kcal/day with exercise. This makes your new TDEE 1,700 kcal/day (with no exercise) or 1,950 kcal/day (with exercise). This makes your final caloric deficit either 200 kcal/day (with no exercise) or 450 kcal/day (with exercise). Thus you may expect it to take 18 days to lose 1 pound of fat without exercise (200 kcal/day * 18 days = 3,600 kcal) or 8 days to lose 1 pound of fat with exercise (450 kcal/day * 8 days = 3,600 kcal).
Below is a visual depiction of the above example using the same numbers. Scenario 1 is at baseline when you are eating 2,000 kcal/d, matching your TDEE, and thus your weight is stable. Scenario 2 is when you eat at 1,500 kcal/d without additional exercise, decreasing your TDEE to 1,700 kcal/d for a deficit of 200 kcal/d. Scenario 3 is when you eat at 1,500 cal/d & add in 300 kcal/d of exercise, yielding a 450 kcal deficit.
Hopefully it is clear why trying to lose weight solely by eating fewer calories can be problematic. RMR, TEF, and NEAT all decrease, slowing weight loss significantly, as your body fights your efforts to lose the weight. Without exercise it is hard to counteract these changes and the only way to continue losing weight at a faster rate is to further reduce calories, making it harder to get in all of the nutrients your body needs to live healthily. You can counteract this with increased exercise; this will increase your caloric deficit and if employing resistance training will help you maintain your LBM as you lose BF, a key factor in staving off weight regain in the long run. Thus, while nutrition is key for weight loss, exercise is still very helpful even beyond the health benefits it confers.
Now with this basic understanding of metabolism, in the next lesson we will begin to discuss more practically how to determine what your caloric intake should be, and if you even need to track calories in the first place.
- Dulloo AG, Miles-Chan JL, Schutz Y. Collateral fattening in body composition autoregulation: its determinants and significance for obesity predisposition. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(5):657‐664. doi:10.1038/s41430-018-0138-6
- Glave A, Didier J, Oden G, Wagner M. Caloric Expenditure Estimation Differences between an Elliptical Machine and Indirect Calorimetry. Exercise Medicine. 2018;2(8):1-5. doi.org/10.26644/em.2018.008
- Heymsfield SB, Peterson CM, Bourgeois B, et al. Human energy expenditure: advances in organ-tissue prediction models. Obes Rev. 2018;19(9):1177‐1188. doi:10.1111/obr.12718
- Levine JA. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003;62(3):667‐679. doi:10.1079/PNS2003281
- Magkos F. On adaptive thermogenesis: just another weight-loss tale? Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Sep 16:nqaa262. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa262. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32936882.
- Martins C, Roekenes J, Salamati S, Gower BA, Hunter GR. Metabolic adaptation is an illusion, only present when participants are in negative energy balance. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Aug 25:nqaa220. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa220. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32844188.
- Melanson EL. The effect of exercise on non-exercise physical activity and sedentary behavior in adults. Obes Rev. 2017;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):40‐49. doi:10.1111/obr.12507
- Moniz SC, Islam H, Hazell TJ. Mechanistic and methodological perspectives on the impact of intense interval training on post-exercise metabolism. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(4):638‐651. doi:10.1111/sms.13610
- Müller MJ, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, Schautz B, Bosy-Westphal A. Advances in the understanding of specific metabolic rates of major organs and tissues in humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16(5):501-508. doi:10.1097/MCO.0b013e328363bdf9
- Ostendorf DM, Melanson EL, Caldwell AE, et al. No consistent evidence of a disproportionately low resting energy expenditure in long-term successful weight-loss maintainers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;108(4):658‐666. doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy179
- Panissa VLG, Fukuda DH, Staibano V, Marques M, Franchini E. Magnitude and duration of excess of post-exercise oxygen consumption between high-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous exercise: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2020 Jul 12. doi: 10.1111/obr.13099. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32656951.
- Rosenbaum M, Leibel RL. Models of energy homeostasis in response to maintenance of reduced body weight. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Aug;24(8):1620-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.21559. PMID: 27460711; PMCID: PMC4965234.
- Villablanca PA, Alegria JR, Mookadam F, Holmes DR Jr, Wright RS, Levine JA. Nonexercise activity thermogenesis in obesity management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(4):509‐519. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.02.001
- Westerterp KR. Diet induced thermogenesis. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2004;1(1):5. Published 2004 Aug 18. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-1-5